An Introduction

Who am I? If you want to know, just Google me. An interesting side-effect of having an uncommon first name and an uncommon last name from different language roots means that I can say with confidence that my name, without even bothering with a middle initial, is internet unique. So any reference you find to Emmett Lalish is in fact referring to me, which may have something to do with why I never really attempted anonymity. 

What is this blog about? Primarily myself and my hobbies, which have a tendency to blur into my career. In searching for a common theme, I found shape to permeate my various endeavors. I love sculpture, and though I didn't take to pottery like my father, I found a medium in 3D printing. It allowed me to combine mathematics and art with a precision I couldn't achieve in traditional media. But even long before that, I made modular origami, chainmail armor, and forged knives: all fundamentally sculptural. 

My original career, aerospace engineering, drew me because I love airplanes. Most people ask if I am or want to be a pilot, but that's not the kind of love I have for them. What I really appreciate is their sleek and elegant form. Airplanes are sexy! And I believe the reason is because they are rare in engineered forms for being so highly optimized as to approach what nature has achieved, which is the very source of our ideals of beauty. 

As my career has turned more and more to software, I find myself still in the realm of sculpture, somewhere between the physical (additive manufacturing) and the ethereal (graphics and rendering). Wherever I am, I want to be on the leading edge, expanding what is known. As an engineer it is my calling to invent the future. Between my emphasis on form and future comes the name of my blog: The Shape of Things to Come. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Perseverance - a history of Manifold

Image
7 minute read. If I had known it would take this long, would I have started? This is a question I asked myself when looking back at the development of Manifold , and I honestly don't know the answer. Certainly taking on this challenge was born largely of naivety in software engineering, especially when realizing I worked on it for almost eight years before it saw the light of day.  Why did I take on this project? It started with 3D printing, where I found out that much of the lack of reliability stemmed from models that had non-manifold mesh data. Manifoldness is what allows a mesh to represent a solid, with a clear inside and outside, so without this the computer is left to guess what your intentions are. In many cases there is simply no clear way for an algorithm to proceed when it encounters a non-manifold mesh.  At first I thought these non-manifold meshes were simply the result of bugs, but while working at Microsoft I got to work with experts from many of the major CAD ...
Read more

3D Interaction

Image
8 minute read. UX (user experience) design is hard - for those not in the industry, it's basically a slightly broader term for UI (user interface) or GUI (graphical user interface), which is to say how we as engineers let you the user interact with our software. I'll preface this by saying I have no formal training in UX, but then again I don't have formal training in sculpture or software engineering either, and I like to think that hasn't stopped me. 2D UX is plenty tricky, but 3D is a real bear. I've ended up designing and building a fair amount of 3D UX simply because there was no one else (a common deficiency of large software companies is a dearth of UX experts). I'm pretty proud of what I've built and I'll describe it in the hopes that it's copied, because I have spent a lot of time being frustrated by awful 3D interfaces. What makes 3D so hard? The biggest issue is that the interface (screen, mouse, touchscreen) is all 2D. Worse yet, it ...
Read more

Manifold Performance

Image
4 minute read. The primary purpose of my Manifold library is topologically-robust results, as I've already discussed . My secondary purpose is to make it fast by leveraging the power of parallel processing. There is still significant work that can be done to improve performance, but I'm proud enough of its current state to show some benchmark comparisons.  How to benchmark? It would be nice to show some kind of big-O trend, but different shapes have wildly different results: if we take n to be the number of triangles in each input shape, the number of intersections could be anywhere from zero to n 2 , which will directly affect the processing time. The Menger sponge is an example that scales close to  n 2 , but that is not common. If you think of the progression of  n  as a refinement function, subdividing the triangles into smaller ones, then you would generally expect to have O( n 1/2 ) intersections since the surface is 2-dimensional while the intersection cu...
Read more